“No Room to Spare” - Ottawa’s Community Response to Hoarding Plan (url)

January 27, 2008

Recently I have been working with a person who hoards stuff, especially food.  I have been trying to understand this phenomenon and find resources that communities and/or organizations have developed as people who hoard often face homelessness if evicted.

One of the most informative documents I have come across so far is the "No Room to Spare - Ottawa’s Community Response to Hoarding Plan" which promotes a coordinated community response (see

http://www.cmha-hp.on.ca/documents/SCPI_FINAL_Report_No_Room_to_Spare.pdf).

if you know people who are hoarders

January 18, 2008

see http://www.squalorsurvivors.com/ - very humane and helpful website written by people who have addressed or are attempting to address issues their issues around hoarding.

“The Center for Public Integrity: Investigative Journalism in the Public Interest” - website url

January 12, 2008

 

The Center for Public Integrity: Investigative Journalism in the Public Interest
http://www.publicintegrity.org/ 

Demand for congressional hearings into FDA process on Dendreon’s Provenge

December 18, 2007
The below is from the blog of -
Howard (Jack) West, MD
Dr. West serves as the Founder and Managing Member of OncTalk, LLC. He is a medical oncologist and Director of Medical Therapeutics for Thoracic Oncology at the Swedish Cancer Institute in Seattle, Washington.

Request for Congressional Inquiry into Drug Approval Process

  Returning to a situation I’ve written about in a couple of prior posts about the contentious saga of the Dendreon (local Seattle company) investigational vaccine Provenge for prostate cancer (posts here and here), three senators have requested a congressional inquiry into the FDA decision to withhold approval of provenge after it had been recommended for approval by an advisory committee to the FDA, as described in a story here.  As described in the second of the posts listed above, this issue was pursued primarily by the group CaretoLive, comprised of prostate cancer advocates and some investors who feel that there was far too much onco-politics in the high level FDA recommendations for who would participate in the final committee, and that two key academic oncologists who served on the committee had potentially significant conflicts of interest that may have denied provenge a completely fair opportunity, and in the process denied prostate cancer patients a potentially helpful treatment.

continued at: 

http://onctalk.com/2007/12/14/request-for-congressional-inquiry-into-drug-approval-process/

I have been following this issue and I am so happy to see that a congressional hearing is likely to investigate the conflicts of interest (COIs) of a couple of the participants on the FDA advisory committee re:  Provenge.  This has only occurred because of the advocacy of the prostate cancer community who were appalled by the FDA decision-making process in this instance.  If I was a journalist, this would make a very interesting book IMO as this scenario outlines how FDA advisory committee members are not neutral/objective, have their own turfs to protect both in terms of ideology/approaches about treatment but also with regard to which companies they are on the boards of, what hedge funds their family members may be representatives of, etc.  It has been an eye-opener for me watching the Provenge saga unfold and I am very thankful that there are people fighting this FDA decision as it stinks of corruption and greed.  

Most of all, that the prostate cancer community has managed to raise such a stink about the delay of Provenge as a treatment for end-stage prostate cancer sufferers, have kept at this issue until it has reached the point of a congressional hearing in the U.S.,  is a tribute to the human spirit that says enough is enough - this is a travesty. 

Human Rights Day – 10 December 2007

December 10, 2007


 
The universally recognized Human Rights Day marks the anniversary of the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on 10
December in 1948 in Paris.

On this coming Human Rights Day, 10 December 2007, the United Nations will launch a one-year intensive programme of activities
leading up to the commemoration next year of the 60th anniversary of the Declaration under the slogan: dignity and justice for all of us.

The adoption of the Universal Declaration was followed by the adoption of the Covenants of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
and on Civil and Political Rights, and a vast array of human rights conventions and treaties promoting and protecting the rights of children, women, minorities, indigenous peoples, migrants, disabled persons; eliminating racial and all other discrimination to name but a few. They have been ratified by the majority of UN Member States and together form a remarkable body of international human rights law.

Implementation of these set standards remains a challenge.  While the universal human rights standards and their oversight have
been strengthened over the years, forces and trends (by states and private companies) that threaten and undermine these universal human rights continue unabated. Weapons profiteers develop machines that threaten and violate the human right to life and prevent the realisation of other fundamental freedoms. Our planet and its finite resources  are threatened by those who choose profit over the right of future generations to exist.  

While billions of dollars are wasted extending the arms race to outer space and developing a new generation of nuclear weapons,
1.2 billion people have no access to clean water and are forced to drink filthy, disease-ridden water.  Fatal shortages and mismanagement of water resources is already a source of conflict.  It is predicted that two thirds of countries will experience severe water shortages by 2025, and if these predictions are accurate, resource wars will  increase globally. Water is not a service to be commoditized, but a common good to be protected, and it is a human need, as well as a finite
resource on our common globe.

Since its inception in 1915, the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom (WILPF) has worked for all human rights to be respected. We have equally worked for the prevention of war and the eradication of militarism, believing that these conditions negate human rights. We are convinced that human rights cannot exist without peace and freedom.

As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights enters its 60th year, and as the new Human Rights Council struggles to monitor and
implement the universal standards for justice and human rights developed through exhaustive debate by governments and civil society, women have the right, the responsibility, and the sense of solidarity to defend, reclaim and realise human rights for all, as they have done, and continue to do for themselves.

The sad reality is that too often under the false pretext to protect women, women are denied the right to education, mobility,
the right to their own body and the free choice to plan their own future. All over the world, women have to struggle for basic human rights on many levels.
 
Exercising the right to have an equal voice in international policy-making and the questions of war and peace, The
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom calls for:

-  the right of peoples to exercise political and economic sovereignty over their land and its resources;
-  the right of peoples to live without fear of violence, occupation or military rule;
-  the right of people to sustain themselves from their environment, to practice self-sufficiency and to be independent from
    companies, governments, and states who may try to coerce them into exploitative policies;
-  the right of women to receive equal pay for equal work;
-  the right of all people to be free from sexual slavery, other forms of bonded labour and exploitative conditions of work;
-  the right of all people to have an equal and informed say in their government’s policy creation and implementation.
 

Best Wishes,
Secretary General
Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom

www.wilpf.ch
http://www.PeaceWomen.org

“ONE WEEK REMAINING IN THE NATIONAL PRO-CHOICE CANADA CONTEST!

December 4, 2007



 

Join us in celebrating 20 years of safe and legal
reproductive choice in
Canada!

To celebrate, we want to hear your thoughts.

Tell us why a "Pro-Choice Canada" is so important and you
could win a
trip to Ottawa and the chance to be on national television!


More expressive through art than through word?

Submit your pro-choice work of art and you could have your
artwork
featured on the cover of a book!



In January 2008, Canadians everywhere will celebrate the
20th
anniversary of the Morgentaler decision that decriminalised
abortion in
Canada and gave women the right to control their
reproductive health. We
want you to reflect and celebrate with us! Too often,
sexual and
reproductive health issues are silenced in our country…
we would like
to offer you the opportunity to share your story.

Tell us in your own words through an essay, song lyrics, a
poem, a rant
or a testimony why the pro-choice movement has been- and
continues to be
so important. Or, you may choose to express your pro-choice
sentiments
through a painting, a drawing, a photo or another form of
visual art.
Enter the contest as many times as you want, the options
are endless!

If you like the idea of empowering Canada but would rather
do so
anonymously… that’s ok too! We will be accepting
submissions from both
participants who wish to share their thoughts publicly and
from
participants who would like to see their work published
anonymously in a
book of pro-choice compilations. Of course, in order to be
considered
for the contest you cannot be anonymous, but we would love
to hear from
you either way.



To enter the contest, please visit
www.canadiansforchoice.ca
<http://www.canadiansforchoice.ca/>  and scroll down until
you see the
"Pro-Choice Canada Contest". You can either enter online,
or print off
the submission form and mail in your entry. Please share
this contest
announcement with family members, colleagues, clients and
friends.  Our
goal is to have a wide array of diverse stories and artwork
to present
to the Canadian population in January in celebration of the
Morgentaler
Anniversary. Be a part of this important event… share
your story!

“FDA’s Refusal to Approve New Cancer Vaccine - The Plot Thickens - Part I News”

November 28, 2007

Washington, DC: Dying prostate cancer patients waiting for the approval of Provenge, a new life-extending cancer vaccine, are being held hostage by an FDA infested with industry insiders with enormous financial interests in what has become a multibillion dollar cancer treatment racket for drug companies, cancer researchers, and treatment providers alike.

On May 8, 2007, FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach refused to approve
Provenge for men with end-stage prostrate cancer and instead, issued a Complete Response letter to Seattle-based Dendreon, the vaccine’s maker, requesting more data that may not be available until 2010.

Cancer patients and advocacy groups say intentionally delaying the approval of new therapies for terminally ill patients in order to protect profits in the research and treatment industry should be a criminal offense, and they are calling on Congress and the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) to conduct a full investigation of the conflicts of interests involving the FDA officials responsible for the non-approval of Provenge.

As for the data requested by the FDA, an accurate assessment of the full effects of Provenge on survival can not be assessed easily because many of the participants in the clinical trials are still alive many years after they received the vaccine.

In a perverse twist of fate, because patients are living longer with a vaccine that works, it will take longer to provide the FDA with the data it requested.

“Raven and Jason” - a short doc.

November 26, 2007

at http://www.theglobeandmail.com/ravenandjason

from the Downtown Eastside of Vancouver

“Dr Drug Rep” - url for NYT’s article

"Dr Drug Rep"

November 25, 2007

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/25/magazine/25memoir-t.html?em&ex=1196226000&en=14f86674a4b9bfd7&ei=5087%0A

This article is by a psychiatrist who became a spokesperson for Wyeth’s anti-depressant drug Effexor XR.  I found the comments about data-mining by pharmaceutical companies in tracking the medications that physicians prescribe so that reps. can hone their strategies to target specific physicians and psychiatrists with their sales-pitches enlightening.  People in poor health, especially those suffering from depression, are unlikely to challenge their doctors as they just want to feel better. 

CBC’s Tapestry

My radio was broken in my last car, may the green machine rest in peace, so for years I drove around in silence.  I am really enjoying listening to the CBC again while driving.  Today, driving back from a jaunt to Rathtrevor Provincial Park near Parksville, which is an incredible spot and only 30 minutes from Nanaimo, I caught the below broadcast on Tapestry which I found thought-provoking. 

The Upper-Middle Path

You’ve heard about the "Middle Path"? It’s one of Buddhism’s key teachings: steer clear of extremes; find a balance between indulging the senses and going overboard on deprivation.

But what happens when the Buddha’s "Middle Path" becomes the "Upper-Middle Path”? Meet Kobai Scott Whitney, a writer and Buddhist prison chaplain. He says North American Buddhists are turning the great tradition into some kind of Buddhism Lite: taking what they like and leaving the rest. Newbie Buddhists, Kobai says, simply ignore anything too demanding, preferring to zone out on their comfy meditation cushions. Mary Hynes meets Kobai Scott Whitney (the name means Old Plum) on Tapestry.

Here are a couple of other references to Kobai Scott Whitney’s thoughts and work:

http://www.wildmind.org/blogs/on-practice/kobai-renunciation#more-454

http://www.prisondharmanetwork.org/