Media and Health (abstract)
Social Science & Medicine 64 (2007) 164-173
The paradoxical reliance on allopathic medicine and positivist science among skeptical audiences
Juanne N. Clarkea, Stephanie Arnolda, Michelle Everesta, Kyle Whitfieldb
Wilfrid Laurier University Waterloo, Ont. Canada
University of Waterloo, Canada
Available online 11 October 2006
Abstract
A number of studies have found an association between what people see, hear and read in the mass media and their
corresponding actions and beliefs. This link has been demonstrated both at the micro and at the macro levels of analysis.
However, when people are asked directly about the impact of mass media theytend to deny that they are personally
affected. In fact, they tend to describe themselves as critical and skeptical media consumers. The purpose of this paper is to
explore this contradiction through 12 in-depth focus group discussions undertaken in Ontario, Canada in 2004. Findings
from the focus group interviews confirm earlier research in that people claimed that they were not susceptible to media influence.
At the same time as they said that they took information from the mass media "with a grain of salt", they articulated sophisticated and nuanced accounts of how and why they evaluated some information as good and some as bad. In general they evaluated media stories on the basis of the values of allopathic medicine and positivistic science. Moreover, in the context of the focus groups and their
explicit comments on their skepticism, they discussed health information from the magazine articles that they were given to read (on either HIV/AIDS, Alzheimer’s disease, or a heart disease). Possible explanations for these paradoxical findings are discussed.
2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Canada; Health; Media; Audience interpretation;
Medicalization
